To reduce the potential threat of soil loss due to ephemeral gullies, it is crucial to adopt Best Management Practices (BMPs) that prevent damage to landscapes by reducing sediments load. The current research evaluated the impact of five BMPs, including cover crops, grassed waterways, no-till, conservation tillage, and riparian buffer strips for reduction of sediment load from sheet/rill, and ephemeral gully erosion in an agricultural watershed in Southern Ontario, Canada. The study aimed to automatically calibrate AnnAGNPS using genetic algorithm and the most sensitive parameters of the model identified using a combination of Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) and One-At-a-Time (OAT) approach. It also utilized the calibrated model to simulate the effectiveness of BMPs in reducing the average seasonal and annual sediment loads from both sources of erosion (sheet/rill, and ephemeral gully) to determine the most effective practices. Riparian buffer strips were consistently successful in decreasing average seasonal sediment load of sheet/rill erosion, with an average reduction efficiency of 72 % in Spring, 64 % in Summer, 65 % in Fall, and 76 % in Winter. In terms of reducing average seasonal sediment load from ephemeral gully erosion, grassed waterways proved to be the most effective BMPs. They showed efficiency of 90 % in Spring; 83 % in Summer; 79 % in Fall; and 75 % in Winter. Considering the average annual sediment load, riparian buffer strips were consistently successful in decreasing average annual sediment load of sheet/rill erosion, with 69% reduction efficiency. Similarly, grassed waterways were the most effective BMPs for reducing average annual sediment load of ephemeral gully erosion, with an efficiency of 81 %. Additionally, grassed waterways were found to be the most efficient BMPs for reducing average annual total sediment load with reduction efficiency of 71 %. These results demonstrate the importance of implementing effective BMPs to address ephemeral gully erosion in watersheds where ephemeral gullies are the main source of erosion.

This study aims to investigate the economic effects of stormwater best management practices (BMPs) on housing sale prices in Washington, D.C., BMPs play a significant role in mitigating multiple threats, such as water pollution, soil erosion, and property damage. While studies on the economic value of BMPs were limited, literature addresses that housing sale prices can be affected by nearby stormwater BMPs. This study addresses the following research questions: Do stormwater BMPs positively impact housing sale prices? How do proximity and number of structural BMPs affect the housing sale prices? We used the hedonic pricing method by applying multiple linear regression models to determine whether a set of independent variables significantly improved the models. Our primary findings indicate that BMPs have positive, negative, or no effects on housing sale prices. The proximity of BMPs inside of parks increased housing sale prices in all buffers. In contrast, the proximity of BMPs outside of parks and impervious roads decreased housing sale prices in all buffers. Percent tree canopy coverage negatively linked to a 50 m buffer and had no relationship with other buffers on housing sale prices. This study implies that BMPs impact housing prices and can be improved by landscape architects, policymakers, and stakeholders.

The disturbance that ground-based extraction operations can imply on the forests ecosystem is an issue which demands more attention. Skidding and forwarding are the two most common ground-based extraction systems. While skidding implies to partially or fully dragging the logs on the ground, in forwarding, timber is transported on a deck thus avoiding direct contact with the soil. Generally, skidding is considered to be more impactful than forwarding in relation to the amount of disturbance on forest soil and residual stand. However, the framework depicted in current literature is not so strict. While skidding actually implies a higher level of damage to residual stand, the situation concerning disturbance to forest soil is much more complex. The dissimilarities in the results from various studies on this topic have shown the level of complexity. The lack of research investigating the consequences of the two extraction systems on the overall forest ecosystem is evident. Only a few studies were focused for example on the implications on biodiversity. However, the beneficial effects of best management practices, such as the application of snatch blocks during winching or positioning brush mats on the skid trails/ strip roads to reduce soil compaction, have been clearly demonstrated.