This paper presents an analysis of long, large-diameter bored piles' behavior under static and dynamic load tests for a megaproject located in El Alamein, on the northern shoreline of Egypt. Site investigations depict an abundance of limestone fragments and weak argillaceous limestone interlaid with gravelly, silty sands and silty, gravelly clay layers. These layers are classified as intermediate geomaterials, IGMs, and soil layers. The project consists of high-rise buildings founded on long bored piles of 1200 mm and 800 mm in diameter. Forty-four (44) static and dynamic compression load tests were performed in this study. During the pile testing, it was recognized that the pile load-settlement behavior is very conservative. Settlement did not exceed 1.6% of the pile diameter at twice the design load. This indicates that the available design manual does not provide reasonable parameters for IGM layers. The study was performed to investigate the efficiency of different approaches for determining the design load of bored piles in IGMs. These approaches are statistical, predictions from static pile load tests, numerical, and dynamic wave analysis via a case pile wave analysis program, CAPWAP, a method that calculates friction stresses along the pile shaft. The predicted ultimate capacities range from 5.5 to 10.0 times the pile design capacity. Settlement analysis indicates that the large-diameter pile behaves as a friction pile. The dynamic pile load test results were calibrated relative to the static pile load test. The dynamic load test could be used to validate the pile capacity. Settlement from the dynamic load test has been shown to be about 25% higher than that from the static load test. This can be attributed to the possible development of high pore water pressure in cohesive IGMs. The case study analysis and the parametric study indicate that AASHTO LRFD is conservative in estimating skin friction, tip, and load test resistance factors in IGMs. A new load-settlement response equation for 600 mm to 2000 mm diameter piles and new recommendations for resistance factors phi qp, phi qs, and phi load were proposed to be 0.65, 0.70, and 0.80, respectively.

Large-diameter bored piles can safely transmit loads from structures by skin friction to the surrounding soil strata and end bearing at the bedrock layer, thereby providing a high compressive capacity. High-Strain Dynamic Testing (HSDT) provides a unique alternative technique to traditional Static Load Testing (SLT) for determining the static compressive resistance of the bored piles, considering its quicker performance and significant cost reductions. This article's main objective is to numerically explore the performance of large-diameter bored piles during the HSDT and to understand their dynamic behavior under an axial compressive impact force. This research is based on testing pile foundations for reinforced concrete mixed-use towers in the coastal zone of New Alamein City, Egypt. The tested pile is a 1.20 m diameter bored pile. Numerical modeling is performed to simulate both the HSDT and the SLT for two piles at the same site. Non-linear axisymmetric finite element modeling is employed to validate both test records and develop some sort of matching between the two tests. As lumped models, the developed numerical models use the signal-matching process, which is conducted by varying and adopting the strength parameters and deformation characteristics of the ground or soil deposit and the soil-pile interface. The predicted load-displacement curves, developed from analyzing dynamic records employing the Modified Unloading Point (MUP) method, are consistent with the field records. The verified non-linear models are utilized to accomplish a comparative parametric analysis to better understand the drop-mass system aspects. The analysis results emphasize the significance of employing adequate impact energy (i.e., dropping height and mass) to move the pile top to a sufficient extent to mobilize its full resistance. However, a longer impact duration, i.e., larger mass, is more effective for achieving a deeper high-strain wave. The impact load should be developed by a larger drop mass with a lower drop height, not a smaller drop mass with a higher drop height. The results also indicate that, for relatively longer piles, the skin friction of the upper layers surrounding the pile shaft is fully mobilized, whereas the skin resistance of the lower layers is not fully mobilized, regarding the stress wave phenomenon effect. Finally, this study's findings can be employed to develop guidelines and design procedures for the HSDT to be effectively performed on bored piles.

Piles are deep foundation elements that play a crucial role in supporting substantial structural loads, particularly in the construction of heavily loaded port structures and bridges. Pile driving involves the installation of piles into the shoreline and/or seabed. These piles can be composed of different materials, including wood, concrete, steel, or a combination thereof. This article aims to provide an overview of pile driving fundamentals, highlight the common issues faced during the pile driving process, and potential solutions to address these challenges. The typical problems encountered in the advancement of displacement piles on large-scale marine projects are considered to include overrunning of piles, driving piles out of alignment, failing to account for obstructions, unexpected soil conditions, pile damage, lateral movement in adjacent piles, pile handling, and pile driving analysis issues. During pile installation, it is not uncommon to observe substantial differences between the field measurements obtained using a pile dynamic analyzer (PDA) and the axial capacity predicted by a GRLWEAP analysis. These discrepancies often arise when incorrect parameters are employed in the analysis. It is crucial to meticulously evaluate factors such as pile type, axial capacity, and site conditions during the design phase. Additionally, this article underscores the utmost significance of conducting a thorough soil investigation, including an understanding of the site's geology and development history. If necessary, conducting an indicative test pile program also helps to ensure the success of pile foundation design and construction.