Pentastiridius leporinus, a polyphagous planthopper, has emerged as a significant vector of the phloem-limited pathogens ARSEPH and PHYPSO, posing a severe threat to agricultural production across Europe. This study explores the complex interactions between P. leporinus, its pathogens, and host plants, focusing on its impact on sugar beet, potato, and recently identified vegetable crops such as carrots and beetroots. The transmission of these pathogens leads to reduced yield and quality, causing substantial economic losses and threatening food security and supply chains. P. leporinus exhibits remarkable adaptability, spreading efficiently over long distances and colonizing diverse crops. Its life cycle, involving nymph development in soil and adult migration to host plants, underpins its reproductive success and rapid geographic expansion. While ARSEPH and PHYPSO reduce crop viability and processing quality, their combined infections exacerbate the damage, introducing secondary pathogens and compounding challenges for farmers. Control measures for P. leporinus remain limited due to the lack of resistant crop varieties, long-term insecticide effi cacy, and precise infestation thresholds. Current efforts emphasize a holistic, integrated pest management (IPM) strategy, combining agronomic practices such as early harvesting, crop rotation, and soil cultivation with emerging tools like biocontrol agents, forecasting models, and experimental genetic techniques. Trials with cover nets and tolerant crop varieties show promise in mitigating the pest's impact, but further research is essential. This work highlights critical knowledge gaps, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration and increased funding to develop sustainable, environment-friendly solutions. Practical research and immediate action is necessary to mitigate the devastating effects of P. leporinus on agriculture. The authors therefore propose the establishment of an EU task force on plant health emergencies, as foreseen in the amendment of EU plant health legislation. A national initiative is not sufficient to manage the existential threat situation.