Little is known about biological soil crust (BSC) formation during the early stages of primary succession following glacial retreat. Here, we report on focused sampling of twelve discrete BSC colonies near the snout of a retreating glacier in the High Arctic and show that BSC colonies had significantly higher 16S and 18S rRNA gene diversity than the simpler communities of bare sediments sampled next to each colony. Surprisingly, the colonies also had a higher degree of community dispersion than the more clustered bare sediment controls. There were only eight 16S amplicons that showed 100% prevalence in all 12 of the colonies, and the three most abundant of these keystone amplicons were cyanobacteria, including a nitrogen fixing Nostoc. The only 18S amplicon common to all colonies was a diatom related to Sellaphora. This prominence of phototrophs indicates that early-successional BSC colonies are being supported by photosynthesis rather than ancient- or aeolian-derived organic matter. Co-occurrence network analysis among the phototrophs and fungi identified several potential early-successional soil lichens. Overall, our fine-scaled sampling revealed new insights into community assembly and function in actual communities of interacting microbes (as opposed to mixed communities in bulk soil samples) during the early stages of primary succession. By sampling discrete microbial colonies, we demonstrate how microbial communities assemble on sediments of a recently uncovered glacial forefield in the High Arctic (Midtre Lov & eacute;nbreen, Svalbard).

Questions Is the macrolichen Usnea antarctica a nurse' species to Antarctic flora? Are positive plantplant interactions more frequent than negative interactions in Antarctic ecosystems? Are microclimatic modifications by cushions of U.antarctica responsible for the nurse effect? Location Two sites in Antarctica: King George Island, South Shetland (62 degrees 11S, 58 degrees 56W; 62 degrees 11S, 58 degrees 59W). Methods We evaluated the association of plant species with U.antarctica cushions by recording species growing in equivalent areas within and outside U.antarctica cushions. Additionally, we performed transplant experiments with Deschampsia antarctica individuals to assess if U.antarctica cushions enhance plant survival. In both study sites we monitored temperature, moisture and nutrient status of soil outside and within the cushions to provide insights into potential mechanisms underlying possible interactions between U.antarctica and other plant species. Results Eight out of 13 species were positively associated with cushions of the widespread lichen U.antarctica, while only one species (U.aurantiaco-atra) showed a negative association with U.antarctica. Survival of Deschampsia was enhanced when growing associated with U.antarctica cushions. Our results indicate that cushions ameliorated the extreme conditions of Antarctic islands through increased temperature and soil moisture, decreased radiation and evaporative water loss and increased nutrient availability. Conclusions The nurse effect of U.antarctica is verified. Cushions of this macrolichen may be a key component in structuring the Antarctic landscape and maintaining local species richness, and their presence might influence range expansion of other species.