As the regulator of water and nutrient changes in the active layer after permafrost degradation, root signaling substances affect the plant-soil carbon allocation mechanism under climate warming, which is a key issue in the carbon source/sink balance in permafrost regions. To explore how plant root signaling substances regulate carbon allocation in plants and soils under permafrost degradation, the changes in carbon allocation and root signaling substances in the plants and soils of peatland in different permafrost regions at the time of labeling were studied by in situ C-13 labeling experiments. The results showed that the fixed C-13 of Larix gemlini, Carex schumidtii, and Sphagnum leaves after photosynthesis was affected by permafrost degradation. In regions with more continuous permafrost, the trend of the L. gemlini distribution to underground C-13 is more stable. Environmental stress had little effect on the C-13 accumulation of Vaccinium uliginosum. Nonstructural carbohydrates, osmotic regulatory substances, hormones, and anaerobic metabolites were the main root signaling substances that regulate plant growth in the peatlands of the three permafrost regions. The allocation of carbon to the soil is more susceptible to the indirect and direct effects of climate and environmental changes, and tree roots are more susceptible to environmental changes than other plants in isolated patches of permafrost regions. The physical properties of the soil are affected by climate change, and the allocation of carbon is regulated by hormones and osmotic regulators while resisting anoxia in the sporadic regions of permafrost. Carbon allocation in discontinuous permafrost areas is mainly regulated by root substances, which are easily affected by the physical and chemical properties of the soil. In general, the community composition of peatlands in permafrost areas is highly susceptible to environmental changes in the soil, and the allocation of carbon from the plant to the soil is affected by the degradation of the permafrost.

The accumulation of microplastics in agricultural soil brings unexpected adverse effects on crop growth and soil quality, which is threatening the sustainability of agriculture. Biochar is an emerging soil amendment material of interest as it can remediate soil pollutants. However, the mechanisms underlying biochar alleviated the toxic effects of microplastics in crops and soil were largely unknown. Using a common economic crop, peanut as targeted species, the present study evaluated the plant physiologica and molecular response and rhizosphere microbiome when facing microplastic contamination and biochar amendment. Transcriptome and microbiome analyses were conducted on peanut root and rhizosphere soil treated with CK (no microplastic and no biochar addition), MP (1.5% polystyrene microplastic addition) and MB (1.5% polystyrene microplastic+2% peanut shell biochar addition). The results indicated that microplastics had inhibitory effects on plant root development and rhizosphere bacterial diversity and function. However, biochar application could significantly promote the expressions of key genes associated with antioxidant activities, lignin synthesis, nitrogen transport and energy metabolism to alleviate the reactive oxygen species stress, root structure damage, nutrient transport limitation, and energy metabolism inhibition induced by microplastic contamination on the root. In addition, the peanut rhizosphere microbiome results showed that biochar application could restore the diversity and richness of microbial communities inhibited by microplastic contamination and promote nutrient availability of rhizosphere soil by regulating the abundance of nitrogen cycling-related and organic matter decomposition-related microbial communities. Consequently, the application of biochar could enhance root development by promoting oxidative stress resistance, nitrogen transport and energy metabolism and benefit the rhizosphere microecological environment for root development, thereby improved the plant-soil system health of microplastic-contaminated agroecosystem.