The study applies the Minimum Impact Design Standards (MIDS) calculator to assess urban trees' effectiveness in reducing surface runoff along five flood-prone streets in Hue City, analyzing evapotranspiration, rainfall interception, and infiltration, along with Leaf Area Index (LAI), Canopy Projection (CP), tree pit size, and soil structure. Results show that urban trees retain 1,132.39 m(3) of stormwater, but runoff reduction is not solely dependent on tree quantity. Although tree numbers vary 1.56 to 3.8 times, runoff reduction differs only 1.39 to 1.79 times. Evapotranspiration plays the largest role, contributing 2.8 times more than interception and 2.6 times more than infiltration. Small tree pits and compacted soil limit infiltration, while pruning and height reduction decrease Pc and LAI, reducing flood mitigation benefits. Annual storm damage further weakens this capacity. To enhance effectiveness, the study suggests prioritizing storm-resistant species, increasing tree numbers, enlarging tree pits, and using structured soil. Implementing these measures can improve urban flood resilience and maximize trees' hydrological benefits. Future research should focus on optimizing tree selection and planting strategies for long-term flood management in urban areas, ensuring sustainable solutions that enhance both stormwater control and environmental resilience.

During typhoons, risk of wind destruction to trees is harder to predict for trees in urban areas than for those in plains, and the influencing factors are more intricate. This study integrated a simplified HWIND mechanistic model for trees, computational fluid dynamics simulations for airflow, and quantified tree morphology indicators to predict the risk of wind destruction to urban trees. The workflow was demonstrated using three typical streets in Guangzhou, China. The workflow was verified based on the observed damage states of case trees in the study areas after Typhoon Mangkhut. Original critical wind speed in plains (CWSP(10)) and urban regions (CWS(10)) at a height of 10 m were introduced to evaluate the wind resistance and destruction risk to urban trees. The relative influence of various factors on CWS(10) and CWSP(10) was evaluated through Relative Weight Analysis and Random Forest. For urban trees with uprooting as the primary destruction mode, wind resistance is mainly influenced by tree height and total root-soil length in terms of tree morphology indicators, while the decisive factor affecting wind destruction risk is the built environment indicator, defined as BEI = CWS(10)/CWSP(10).

Trees growing in urban environments are often impacted by maintenance or construction work involving the cutting of roots. Tree protection zones have been proposed to avoid critical damage to the tree. However, despite incorporating quantitative information, they heavily rely on expert judgement that remains to be validated. In a study conducted across six parks in Quebec City, Canada, two commonly found tree species, Acer platanoides L. and Tilia cordata Mill., presumed to be different in terms of vulnerability to root damage, were subjected to a range of trenching treatments. The trees were between 23 and 40 cm diameter at breast height (DBH). A safety factor was calculated relating the turning moment the tree can withstand to the turning moment imposed by high winds likely to occur. The safety factor against uprooting was assessed for each tree before and after root trenching using a non-destructive pulling approach. The effects of tree species, distance to the trench, and their combined interaction were tested on tree stability. The relationship between tree stability and soil texture, tree characteristics, and the number of damaged roots were also tested. Safety factors were initially variable, ranging from 0.5 to 4.5. T. cordata safety factors were lower than those of A. platanoides and influenced by soil texture. Trenching treatments had no effect on the safety factor, even when two perpendicular trenches were dug at 1 m from the stem. No index of the amount of root damaged was significantly related to the safety factor. Root trenching treatments that encroached closer to the tree trunk than the recommended tree protection zones did not affect the stability of both species. Nevertheless, it is essential to recognize that other ecophysiological processes might still be influenced, and long-term monitoring is crucial. Both should be taken into account when determining these zones.