Post-earthquake investigations have shown that piles in liquefiable soils are highly susceptible to damage, especially in sloping sites. This study examines the seismic performance of pile groups with lateral spreading through advanced numerical modeling. A three-dimensional finite element model, validated against large-scale shaking table test results, is implemented to capture the key mechanisms driving the dynamic response of pile groups under both inertial and kinematic loading conditions. Parametric seismic response analyses are conducted to compare the behavior of batter and vertical piles under varying ground motion intensities. The results indicate that batter piles experience increased axial compressive and tensile forces compared to vertical piles, up to 70% and 20%, respectively. However, batter piles provide enhanced lateral stiffness and shear resistance compared to vertical piles, reducing horizontal displacements by up to 20% and tilting the cap by 85% under strong ground motion. The results demonstrate that batter piles not only enhance the overall seismic stability of the structure but also mitigate the risk of liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in the near-field through pile-pinning effects. While vertical piles are more commonly used in practice, the distinct advantages of batter piles for seismic stability highlighted in this study may encourage using more advanced numerical modeling in engineering projects.

Previous earthquake events indicate that pile foundations in liquefiable soils are vulnerable to damage due to the coupling of inertial and kinematic effects. Inclined piles are widely applied in structures located in liquefiable soils, but few investigations of the coupling of the superstructure-pile inertial and soil-pile kinematic effects have been conducted. To address this gap, this study adopted a three-dimensional (3D) numerical model to investigate the coupling of inertial and kinematic effects in pile foundations with different inclination angles. The pile head bending moment was employed to represent the pile response, while the soil surface displacement and structure acceleration were utilized to quantify the kinematic and inertial effects. The role of the inclination angle on the interactions between inertial and kinematic effects is herein considered for pile groups. In particular, the inertial effect significantly influences the behavior of pile groups with larger inclination angles, whereas the kinematic effect predominates the pile head moment in vertical pile groups. In this paper, the influence of the pile inclination angle, superstructure configuration, and earthquake intensity on the interactions was investigated. The principal findings revealed that the kinematic effect dominates in the vertical pile group irrespective of the properties of the superstructure, while the inertial effect plays a significant role in the response of the inclined pile groups, especially for superstructures with considerable heights. Inclined piles are vulnerable to damage due to the interaction of inertial and kinematic effects during earthquakes. This study conducted a series of three-dimensional (3D) finite-element simulations to investigate the interaction of inertial and kinematic effects in pile foundations with different inclination angles. The influence of pile inclination angle, superstructure height, and earthquake characteristics was investigated. In current practices, various codes and pseudostatic methods have been adopted to sum a percentage of the inertia-induced bending moment and another percentage of the kinematic-induced bending moment. This study indicates that under certain conditions, the simple summing of the bending moment induced by the inertial and kinematic effects could be inaccurate. The present study identified several factors that influence the interaction of inertial and kinematic effects on piles with different inclination angles. The inclined piles in liquefied soil, especially for supporting tall and heavy superstructure, attention should be given to the influence of inertial effect on the pile head bending moment.