This study describes the full-scale traffic evaluation of a prototype submersible matting system (SUBMAT) at a test site on the U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center's campus in Vicksburg, MS. The SUBMAT prototype was designed to bridge the gap between high- and low-tide at a beach interface to enable 24-h vehicle offloading operations at an expeditionary watercraft landing site. This unique system is made from common geotextile materials, is filled with indigenous sand using simple commercially available pumps, and creates a robust driving surface. The results of the study showed that the SUBMAT system was able to sustain an accumulation of 1,000 Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement, 350 Heavy Expanded Mobility Tactical Truck, and over 150 M1A1 main battle tank passes without experiencing any significant damage. The ease of deployment, relatively low cost, and trafficability results could make the SUBMAT a suitable candidate for expedient low-volume roads in austere environments such as stream beds, low-water crossings, recently flooded or flood prone areas, and areas with weak soil.

The availability of quality materials for construction has been an issue in some regions. This scarcity obliged using marginal materials reinforced with geosynthetic materials as one of the quests for sustainability in the pavement industry. In this study, an attempt was made to stabilize the marginal materials by incorporating geosynthetics. The different geosynthetics used in the study are geogrid, geocell, double geogrid, and geocell + geogrid. A series of unreinforced (UR) and geosynthetic reinforced (GR) pavement prototypes were constructed in the laboratory with landslide debris as base material underlain by black cotton soil subgrade. Large-scale cyclic plate load (CPL) tests were performed on test prototypes constructed in the laboratory under cyclic loading following the trapezoidal loading pattern with 0.77 Hz frequency. The efficacy of geosynthetic reinforcement was quantified concerning permanent deformation (PD), resilient deformation (RD), Rut depth reduction (RDR), Traffic improvement ratio (TIR), and reduction in vertical stresses transmitted to the subgrade and reduction in base layer thickness. The test results indicate that the GR significantly reduced the rut depth and improved the traffic capacity. In addition, over all types of GRs, the combination of geogrid and geocell outperformed in terms of permanent deformation and rut depth reduction.

This paper presents a case study on instrumenting, monitoring, and finite element modeling (FEM) of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported (GRPS) mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) walls. The GRPS-MSE wall was monitored using various instruments such as piezometers, earth pressure cells, shape-acceleration arrays (SAAs), and strain gauges. The performance criteria included efficacy, stress concentration ratio (SCR), differential settlement, and reinforcement tension. Collected data, such as excess pore-water pressures, contact pressures on pile and soft soil, differential settlements, and lateral displacement of MSE wall, were analyzed thoroughly. A 3D FEM was also developed to simulate the GRPS MSE wall, and the results are in good agreement with field data. The results demonstrated significant load transfer from soil to piles as a result of soil arching, yielding 30-32 SCR. The field efficacy was measured at 37.69 %, while the FEM efficacy was estimated as 42.4. Strains in geogrids within the geosynthetic-reinforced load transfer platform (GLTP) system were under 1%, less than the 5% maximum recommended by FHWA. The maximum differential settlement measured between pile cap and soft soil from SAAs is 7.1 mm, while it is estimated to be 8.3 mm from FEM. The MSE wall exhibited low lateral displacement (<25 mm), indicating enhanced stability because of GLTP. The comparison between five analytical GLTP design methods showed that the CUR226 methods gave the closest results to field measurements and FEM results. This study offers crucial insights into leveraging GLTP and MSE walls in highway construction.

Pile-supported embankments are commonly employed for highways in soft soil areas. Extensive studies have been conducted on high embankments under static loading. However, low embankments with lower costs and carbon footprint have not yet been thoroughly studied. This study aims to investigate the performance of pilesupported low embankments under cyclic traffic loading by carrying out two large-scale model tests. The soft soil was constructed using Kaolin clay, and the cyclic traffic loading was simulated using a localized semisinusoidal function. The effect of geosynthetic reinforcement on the load transfer mechanism of pilesupported low embankments was investigated by comparing the measured data from unreinforced and reinforced cases. Test results show that geosynthetic reinforcement reduces settlement and leads to faster stabilization of settlement in low embankments. Pile-supported low embankments experience a rapid decrease followed by a stabilization in pile efficacy with increased cyclic loading, and geosynthetic reinforcement increase the pile efficacy and facilitate quicker stabilization. Geosynthetic reinforcement enhances the transfer of static and dynamic stresses to piles, resulting in less stress degradation under cyclic loading. Based on experimental results, pile-supported embankments should account for the adverse effects of cyclic loading, even if they are classified as high embankments according to existing analytical models.