Setting an expandable polystyrene (EPS) board on box culverts can reduce the vertical earth pressure (VEP) acting on the culvert roof. However, long-term backfill load will induce creep in both the EPS board and the surrounding soil, resulting in a change in the stress state of the culvert-soil system. A mechanical model for the long-term interaction of backfill-EPS board-box culvert was established, and theoretical formulas were derived for calculating the earth pressure around the culvert. Numerical simulation was employed to validate the accuracy of the proposed theoretical approach. Research indicates that, with EPS board, the VEP decreases rapidly then slightly increases with time and eventually approaches an asymptotic value, ultimately decreasing by 33%. However, the horizontal earth pressure (HEP) shows the opposite pattern and ultimately increases by 15%. The foundation contact pressure (FCP) increases nonlinearly and reaches a stable value, ultimately increasing by 10.2%. Without the EPS board, the VEP and HEP are significantly different from those with the EPS board. Although EPS boards can reduce the VEP on the culvert, attention should be paid to the variation of HEP caused by the creep of the EPS board and backfill.

Pavements and light structures constructed on expansive subgrade layers have experienced severe damage due to volume changes. These layers have been exposed to climatic changes such as freeze-thaw (FT) cycles. Accurate estimation of design parameters regarding heave/settlement is essential for sustainable performance. This work study the instantaneous and long-term effects of successive FT-cycles on the volume stability, swelling, and compressibility characteristics of natural and lime-treated expansive subgrades. Volume changes were traced during successive 15FT cycles. Swelling and consolidation characteristics were studied immediately after FT-cycles. The long-term effect of FT was tested at different recovery periods around year. FT-cycles significantly affects volume changes and compressibility, this effect is proportional to soil type and limited up to a certain number of FT-cycles. During the long-term recovery, a considerable part of underwent deformation is a permanent and not recovered, even after year the soil still memorizes this effect. Due to the propagated cracks, the plastic deformation increased with increase in FT-cycles.

The sustainability of the vast Arctic permafrost carbon pool under climate change is of paramount importance for global climate trajectories. Accurate climate change forecasts, therefore, depend on a reliable representation of mechanisms governing Arctic carbon cycle processes, but this task is complicated by the complex interaction of multiple controls on Arctic ecosystem changes, linked through both positive and negative feedbacks. As a primary example, predicted Arctic warming can be substantially influenced by shifts in hydrologic regimes, linked to, for example, altered precipitation patterns or changes in topography following permafrost degradation. This study presents observational evidence how severe drainage, a scenario that may affect large Arctic areas with ice-rich permafrost soils under future climate change, affects biogeochemical and biogeophysical processes within an Arctic floodplain. Our in situ data demonstrate reduced carbon losses and transfer of sensible heat to the atmosphere, and effects linked to drainage-induced long-term shifts in vegetation communities and soil thermal regimes largely counterbalanced the immediate drainage impact. Moreover, higher surface albedo in combination with low thermal conductivity cooled the permafrost soils. Accordingly, long-term drainage effects linked to warming-induced permafrost degradation hold the potential to alleviate positive feedbacks between permafrost carbon and Arctic warming, and to slow down permafrost degradation. Self-stabilizing effects associated with ecosystem disturbance such as these drainage impacts are a key factor for predicting future feedbacks between Arctic permafrost and climate change, and, thus, neglect of these mechanisms will exaggerate the impacts of Arctic change on future global climate projections.