This research explores the use of cup lump rubber (CLR), an agricultural by-product, as a component in controlled low-strength material (CLSM) for pavement applications in road construction. Two distinct CLSM mixtures were developed: one based on cement and the other on alkali activation. The study evaluated the workability, mechanical properties, and microstructures of both CLSM formulations. Key fresh properties, including slump flow, setting time, and bleeding, were analysed to assess their impact on the self-compaction process. Mechanical characteristics such as unconfined compressive strength, resilient modulus, and wave velocities were also measured. Some CLSM mixtures, both cement-based and alkali-activated, were found to meet the requirements for soil cement bases and subbases. Notably, the resilient modulus values showed significant improvement after 28 days, with certain mixtures achieving subbase-quality gravel standards. The study concludes by recommending the use of both cement-based and alkali-activated CLSMs in pavement design, highlighting their potential to enhance the field of pavement engineering.

This study evaluated the strength and durability characteristics of pond ash (PA) treated with geopolymer (3%, 6%, 9%, 12%, and 15%, by dry weight of PA) and compared them with Portland cement and hydrated lime stabilizations at same additive contents. Unconfined compressive strength of specimens was evaluated at curing durations of 1, 3, 7, 28, and 90 days. The durability of 28-day cured stabilised specimens against wet-dry cycles, freeze-thaw cycles, water slaking cycles, water immersion, capillary action, and dispersion was assessed. Geopolymer-stabilized PA achieved higher strength and durability than cement and lime-stabilised PA. It is due to the formation of a dense microstructure with significant reaction products. PA stabilised with 3% geopolymer and 15% cement satisfies the strength properties of the cementitious subbase in flexible pavements. Whereas, 6% geopolymer content fulfils the requirements of the cementitious base in flexible pavements and the cementitious subbase in rigid pavements as per IRC: 37-2018 and IRC: 59-2015, respectively.

The surging quest for asphalt pavement sustainable approaches promotes the need for balancing environmental and economic benefits. With the global production of waste plastics (WP) reaching drastic levels and recycling rates remaining disappointingly low, policymakers are increasingly advocating for the reuse of post -consumer recycled plastics in construction materials. In this study, recycling WP emerges as the most feasible solution, particularly when considering the environmental hazards associated with burning and landfilling, such as air and soil pollution. Recycling WP in asphalt mixture specifically has been quested due to the high -daily production of asphalt mixture, but concerns exist regarding its engineering performance. This study's focus is to assess the asphalt mixture mechanical response while incorporating WP, particularly High -Density Polyethylene (HP), in addition to assessing their environmental impacts. Four asphalt mixtures were rigorously evaluated containing four different asphalt binders: polymer -modified PG 76-22 and PG 70-22, unmodified PG 67-22, and HPmodified PG 67-22 asphalt binders. The investigation encompassed an in-depth analysis of asphalt binder rheological characteristics and asphalt mixtures' mechanical properties. A pivotal aspect of this study was comparing the environmental benefits of HP -modified asphalt binders against conventional polymer -modified ones. This comparison was conducted through a detailed cradle -to -gate life -cycle assessment (LCA). Results indicate that asphalt mixture containing WP material demonstrated similar engineering performance as compared to conventional mixture containing PG 70-22 asphalt binder. Further, the LCA analysis revealed that the inclusion of HP WP in asphalt binders, as compared to PG 76-22 and PG 70-22 asphalt binders, can significantly lower the global warming potential by 17.7% and 8.9%, respectively.