The NT-CEP pile is an innovative type of pile that builds upon the conventional concrete straight-hole cast-in-place pile. It primarily consists of two components: the main pile and the bearing plate. The key factors influencing its load-bearing capacity include the pile diameter, the cantilever dimensions of the bearing plate, and the slope of the bearing plate's foot, among others. The pile spacing significantly influences the bearing capacity of NT-CEP pile group foundations. The overall bearing capacity of an NT-CEP pile group foundation is not merely the sum of the ultimate bearing capacities of individual piles; rather, it results from the interactions among the pile bodies, the cap, and the foundation soil. Advancing the design theory of NT-CEP pile groups and enhancing their practical applications in engineering requires an in-depth investigation of how different pile spacings influence the load-bearing performance of pile group foundations. This objective can be achieved by exploring the soil damage mechanisms around side, corner, and central piles. This exploration helps in clarifying the influence of pile spacing on the load-bearing performance. Based on research findings regarding the bearing capacity of single and double pile foundations, this paper utilizes ANSYS finite element simulation analysis to model six-pile and nine-pile groups. Because these arrangements are universally adopted in engineering practice, they are capable of accounting for the pile group effect under various pile spacings and row configurations. The nine-pile group comprises corner piles, side piles, and a center pile, enabling a comprehensive analysis of stress variations among piles at different positions. As six-pile and nine-pile groups represent common pile configurations, studying these two types can provide valuable insights and direct references for optimizing pile foundation design. The study systematically investigates the influence of varying piles spacings on the bearing capacity of NT-CEP pile group foundations. It concludes that, as pile spacing decreases, The displacement of the top of this pile increases. thereby enhancing the group piles effects. Conversely, increasing the spacing between piles represents an effective strategy for elevating the compressive capacity of the NT-CEP pile-group foundation. Larger spacing also increases the vertical load-bearing capacity of the central piles, enhances the lateral friction resistance of corner piles, and heightens the load-sharing proportion between the bearing plate and the pile end. Furthermore, increasing pile spacing raises the ratio of load sharing by the foundation soil for both the CEP nine-pile foundation and the CEP six-pile foundation. The reliability of the simulation study has been verified by a visualization small scale model test of a half cut pile.

Micropile groups (MPGs) are typical landslide resistant structures. To investigate the effects of these two factors on the micropile-soil interaction mechanism, seven sets of transparent soil model experiments were conducted on miniature cluster piles. The soil was scanned and photographed, and the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technique was used to obtain the deformation characteristics of the pile and soil during lateral loading. The spatial distribution information of the soil behind the pile was obtained by a 3D reconstruction program. The results showed that a sufficient roughness of the pile surface was a necessary condition for the formation of a soil arch. If the surface of the pile was smooth, stable arch foundation formation was difficult. When the roughness of the pile surface increases, the soil arch range behind the pile and the load-sharing ratio of the pile and soil will increase. After the roughness reaches a certain level, the above indicators hardly change. Pile spacing within the range of 5-7 d (pile diameters) was suitable. The support effect was poor when the pile spacing was too large. No stable soil arch can be formed, and the soil slips out from between the piles.