Wildfires are increasingly recognized as a critical driver of ecosystem degradation, with post-fire hydrological and soil impacts posing significant threats to biodiversity, water quality, and long-term land productivity. In fire-prone regions, understanding how varying fire intensities exacerbate runoff and erosion is essential for guiding post-fire recovery and sustainable land management. The loss of vegetation and changes in soil properties following fire events can significantly increase surface runoff and soil erosion. This study investigates the effects of varying fire intensities on runoff and sediment yield in the Kheyrud Educational Forest. Controlled burns were conducted at low, moderate, and high intensities, along with an unburned plot serving as the control. For each treatment, three replicate plots of 2 m2 were established. Runoff and sediments were measured over the course of 1 year under natural rainfall. In addition, key soil physical properties, including bulk density, penetration resistance, and particle size distribution (sand, silt, and clay fractions), were assessed to better understand the underlying mechanisms driving hydrological responses. The results revealed that bulk density and penetration resistance were lowest in the control and highest for the high-intensity fire treatment. A significant correlation was observed between bulk density, penetration resistance, and both runoff and sediment production. However, no significant correlation was found between runoff and soil texture (sand, silt, and clay content). Fire intensity had a pronounced effect on runoff and sediment, with the lowest levels recorded in the control and low-intensity fire treatment, and the highest in the high-intensity fire treatment. The total annual erosion rates were 0.88, 1.10, 1.57, and 2.24 tons/ha/year for the control, low-, moderate-, and high-intensity treatments, respectively. The study demonstrates that high-intensity fires induce substantial changes in soil structure and vegetation cover, exacerbating runoff and sediment loss. To mitigate post-fire soil degradation, proactive forest management strategies are essential. Preventive measures-such as reducing fuel loads (e.g., removing uprooted trees in beech stands), minimizing soil compaction and vegetation damage during logging operations, can help reduce the ecological impact of wildfires. These findings provide a scientific basis for adaptive management in fire-prone forests, addressing urgent needs to balance ecological resilience and human activities in wildfire-vulnerable landscapes.

Penetrometers and penetrographers are widely used to measure soil resistance to penetration, but the results are associated with other soil properties (such as bulk density, water content, and particle size distribution). Thus, for an adequate interpretation of results, site-specific studies are necessary to identify which properties are more related to soil resistance. We aimed to measure the resistance to penetration of a Typic Paleudalf under distinct soil uses and to identify soil properties that influence soil resistance. The soil uses in this study included anthropized forest (composed of tree and shrub species), pasture (5-year-old pasture), Eucalyptus 20 (a 20-year-old Eucalyptus saligna stand), and Eucalyptus 4.5 (a 4.5-year-old Eucalyptus saligna under the second rotation). Soil resistance to penetration was measured with an impact penetrometer, and the data were correlated with other physical and mechanical properties of soil, such as the particle size, soil moisture, air permeability, saturated hydraulic conductivity, porosity, bulk density, precompression stress, and compressibility index. We observed that a resistance of 1.3 MPa matches with other soil property values corresponding to soil compaction, and values greater than 1.3 MPa were verified at depths of 0-8 cm for pasture and 8-30 cm for Eucalyptus 4.5. Analyzing all soil uses together, the correlation was significant (p < 0.05) with gravel (r = 0.34), silt (r = -0.32), clay (r = 0.26), gravimetric moisture (r = -0.27), macroporosity (r = 0.24), and soil bulk density at the end of the compressibility test (r = 0.27). The penetrometer is useful for evaluating the physical conditions of soil, but we highlight that soil resistance is influenced by factors such as particle size and soil moisture, as examples. We recommend using a set of soil properties for a better interpretation of penetration resistance data and to support decision-making regarding soil management.

Biochar application, as a kind of soil amendment, significantly influences soil physical and mechanical properties. This study revealed the effects of biochar application on the physical and mechanical properties of a clay-type soil at different irrigation levels. Soil was treated with three levels of biochar application: B0 (0 t ha(-1)), B1 (25 t ha-(1)) and B2 (50 t ha b(-1)), and three levels of irrigation: T0 (1.2 pan evaporation Ep), T1 (1.0 Ep) and T2 (0.8 Ep). The results indicated that other treatments reduced the soil bulk density compared with the control treatment (CK) (B0T1). Compared to CK, the highest reduction in soil bulk density was 18%. Irrigation did not improve the soil bulk density and porosity at the same biochar application in the short term. Biochar enhanced the stability of the soil aggregates. Compared to CK, the largest MWD (mean weight diameter) was enhanced by 9%. The addition of biochar and decreasing irrigation could decrease soil cohesion. The addition of biochar and increasing irrigation could increase the soil internal friction angle. The soil cohesion first increased and then decreased as the soil water content increased. According to the fitting formula, the soil cohesion was found to be minimum at B2T2, which was a decrease of 39% compared to B0T1. At the same irrigation level, the soil internal friction angle decreased with increasing soil water content. Soil penetration resistance showed a decreasing trend with the application of biochar. The more irrigation there is, the larger the soil penetration resistance.

Context or problem: Lone-term application of chemical fertilizers in farmland ensure adequate or profitable crop yields but may damage soil structure. Cover crops (CCs) have great potentials to improve soil quality and promote sustainable crop production. However, the combined impacts of CCs with nitrogen fertilization on soil quality and crop yields are not clear. Objective or research question: We aimed to examine the effects of CCs combined with N fertilization rates on soil physical properties, C and N fractions in both bulk soils and aggregates, and crop yields, and to find the best management practice that improve both soil quality and crop yields synthetically. Methods: A 4-year summer CCs - winter wheat field experiment was conducted in the Loess Plateau of China. CCs with different species and combinations (CC) were soybean (SB), sudan grass (SG), a mixture of both (SS), and no cover crop (CK) and N fertilizer (NR) were applied to winter wheat at rates of 0 (N0), 60 (N60), and 120 (N120) kg N ha(-1). Soil physical properties and C and N fractions in both bulk soils and aggregates were evaluated at 0-10, 10-20, and 20-40 cm soil depths. Results: Soil total porosity (TP), saturated water content (SWC), capillary water capacity (CWC), and C and N fractions decreased while bulk density (BD) increased with the increase of soil depth. The CC, NR, and their interaction (CCxNR) had significant effects on soil BD, aggregate size distribution and stability (MWD), and C and N fractions and only CC and CCxNR had significant effects on other physical properties. The incorporation of CCs significantly increased the proportions of > 5 mm aggregates and C and N fractions in both bulk soils and aggregates, especially in 0-10 and 10-20 cm. And SB and SS improved soil other physical properties more than SG, especially in 0-10 cm, which decreased BD by 13.2% and 12.6% while increased TP by 6.5% and 8.3%, SWC by 14.3% and 15.3%, CWC by 13.9% and 14.2%, MWD by 16.6% and 14.4%, respectively, compared to CK. Additionally, soil physical properties improved more with N60 while the C and N fractions in both bulk soils and aggregates increased more with N120. However, BD increased by 2.6% and 3.3% in N60 and N120 than N0, respectively. The correlations between the proportion of macro-aggregates and soil C and N fractions at 0-10 and 10-20 cm indicated the positive effects of CCs on improving soil structure and fertility simultaneously. Aggregated-associated C and N fractions decreased firstly and then increased with the reduced aggregate sizes, and were higher in micro-aggregates than in other size classes. N60-SB increased wheat yields by 98.7% compared with N0-CK. Conclusions: Overall, the incorporation of soybean residue was the best management practice for winter wheat yield and soil fertility under the reduced N fertilization.

Agricultural practices that lead to soil carbon sequestration may be a win-win strategy for mitigating global warming and improving soil fertility and resource use efficiency. The mechanisms through which soil organic carbon (SOC) concentration affects crop yields are numerous but difficult to separate. The objective of this study was to disentangle these processes and estimate to what extent the yield response to SOC is mainly driven by changes in physical or biochemical properties and processes. This was achieved by analysing the response of yields in continuous maize to SOC concentrations during 20 years (2000-2019), which had evolved in 14 experimental treatments in a Swedish long-term field experiment at Ultuna since 1956, ranging from 0.94% to 3.65% in the topsoil (0-20 cm). Average maize yields during this period varied between 1.9 and 8.4 Mg dry mass per hectare in the different treatments. The treatments comprise applications of different mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizers and organic amendments and combinations thereof. Our analysis showed that maize yield in the treatments that were not severely limited by nitrogen supply or soil acidity increased by 16% for each percentage unit increase in SOC. We applied the widely used concept of critical N concentration in plant biomass to diagnose the N status in maize in the different treatments (N nutrition index [NNI]) and parameterized a response function between yield and pH (RpH). Dry soil bulk density (BD) was used as a proxy for soil physical properties. These three variables NNI, RpH and BD explained 95% of the variation in maize yields among treatments. Further analysis of the relationship between BD, SOC and plant available water capacity revealed that about two thirds of the yield increases in response to SOC change could be ascribed to associated changes in soil physical properties. Our analysis suggests that the extra storage capacity of water, which increased by up to 15 mm in the topsoil for each unit percentage increase in SOC, was the main driver for the observed yield responses. We conclude that measures for increasing SOC in soils most likely are an effective adaptation strategy for reducing the risk of crop damage during dry spells, which probably are becoming more frequent in the future due to climate change, even in relatively humid climates as in Sweden. After about six decades of different agricultural management, soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations differed by up to a factor of four between the treatments in a Swedish field trial. Crop yields increased by 16% for each unit percentage of SOC increase in the high-N treatments and by 14% in the low-N treatments. image

The management of plant wastes and the development of soil quality characteristics have a key role in ensuring the harmony of the agriculture cycle with the environment. By adding the straw of plants directly to the soil as a source of organic matter, time poor soil quality characteristics can be improved. In the study, which was planned as a pot experiment, the effects of increasing the addition of sunflowers straw and maize straw by the increased proportions to clay soil. For this purpose, sunflower and maize harvest residue was added to the soil in 0% control (C), 0.5% (SS0.5 and MS0.5), 1% (SS1 and MS1), 2% (SS2 and MS2), and 4% (SS4 and MS4). Compared to the C, the water stable aggregate value increased by approximately 2.2 and 2.5 times in SS4 and MS4 implementations, mean weight diameter values increased approximately 2.7 and 3.3 times, respectively. In SS4 and MS4 implementations, the available water capacity increased by 80% and 102% compared to the control, respectively, and the modulus of rupture values were decreased by approximately 4.1-4.7 times. The 0.5% and 1% doses of straw implementations did not have great effects on the mechanical properties of the soils. According to the results of this study, 4% straw implementations it has been proven that the addition of SS and MS to the soil that by breaking them into small particles have great importance in rapidly increasing the physical quality of the soils and it can be used as an effective agricultural method.