BACKGROUND Weed-resistance phenomena have increased dramatically in recent years. Bioherbicides can offer a sustainable alternative to chemical weed control but they often have low water solubility and therefore low efficacy in the field. The research reported here represents the first study on the field efficacy against weeds of a nanoencapsulated bioherbicide mimic of aminophenoxazinones, namely DiS-NH2 (2,2 '-disulphanediyldianiline). Field experiments were carried out across three different locations to evaluate the bioherbicide disulphide mimic at standard (T1, 0.75 g m(-2)) and double (T2, 1.5 g m(-2)) doses when compared to no weed control (NC) and chemical weed controlled (PC) in durum wheat. RESULTS The nanoencapsulated bioherbicide displayed better soil permeability than the free compound and also showed lower ecotoxicity on comparing the toxic doses on the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode model. It was found that T2 gave the best performance in terms of phytotoxicity (-57% weed biomass when compared with NC) and crop yield enhancement (3.2 versus 2.2 Mg ha(-1) grain yield), while T1 showed comparable results to PC. T1 and T2 did not cause shifts in weed communities and this is consistent with a broad spectrum of phytotoxicity. Moreover, the nanoparticle formulation tested in this study provided stable results across all three locations. CONCLUSION It is reported here for the first time that a nanoencapsulated DiS-NH2 bioherbicide mimic provided an efficient post-emergence and contact bioherbicide that can control a wide range of weed species in durum wheat without damaging the crop. The mimic also has low ecotoxicity and improved soil permeability. (c) 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

With its advantages of high efficiency, high selectivity and broad spectrum, diphenyl ether herbicides have become a class of herbicides with a wide range of applications, numerous types and huge amounts of use worldwide. The massive and unregulated use of diphenyl ether herbicides has led to their accumulation in soil and water bodies, altering the structure of soil microbial communities and causing huge economic losses by causing damage to sensitive crops in subsequent crops. Meanwhile, it will also accumulate in the food chain, inducing potential hazards to non-target organisms such as aquatic animals and human beings. Therefore, the importance of developing green removal strategies for diphenyl ether herbicides in polluted environments is increasing. Currently, microbial degradation technology has a broad application prospect due to its simple operation, safety and less likely to cause secondary pollution. A variety of Pseudomonas and Bacillus species have been found to efficiently degrade diphenyl ether herbicides, but fewer studies have been conducted on fungi and actinomycetes. Based on this, this paper summarizes the characteristics of the diphenyl ether herbicide family, the mechanism of toxicity. Microbial resources for degrading diphenyl ether herbicides, degradation pathways and the molecular biological basis of the degradation process are outlined. The aim of this paper is to have a more comprehensive understanding of diphenyl ether herbicides and to provide a research direction for in-depth study of treatment strategies for diphenyl ether herbicide residues in the real environment and discovery of more relevant biodegradable resources.

The toxic effects of tetracycline and glyphosate on hulless barley and its environment, as well as their interrelationship, remain poorly understood. The present study aimed to identify biomarkers reflective of tetracycline and glyphosate toxicity, examine root damage and rhizosphere bacterial communities throughout the growth cycle, and assess the final grain quality. Results indicated that the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content in the underground parts of barley could serve as a sensitive biomarker for detecting tetracycline and glyphosate toxicity in barley. In addition, a synergistic effect between 5 mg/kg tetracycline and 5 mg/kg glyphosate was observed at the tillering stage, which not only induced H2O2 accumulation across all growth stages but also ultimately reduced seed quality. During the tillering phase, Proteobacteria dominanted, while Actinobacteria showed greater relative abundance during the jointing stage.By the ripening stage, Acidobacteria predominantly colonized the associated soils. Importantly, the study further identified metagenome-assembled genomes containing cytochrome P450 fragments capable of metabolizing these compounds. This study provides novel insights into the transformation of co-contaminants and the adaptive responses of rhizobacteria to tetracycline and glyphosate exposure, offering valuable information for agricultural practices.

Herbicides are widely employed in agriculture to manage weeds and enhance crop yields, but their extensive use raises significant environmental and human health concerns. Exposure to herbicides can occur through multiple pathways, including ingesting contaminated food and water, inhaling airborne particles, and dermal contact during application. This review delves into the intricate dynamics of herbicide pollution in agriculture, examining their classification, modes of exposure, and impacts on plants, animals, and humans. This study also deals with the mechanisms by which herbicides contribute to adverse health outcomes, such as cellular damage and cancer. To address these risks, this review looks at more sustainable ways to manage weeds, focusing on practical and natural alternatives to chemical herbicides. These include traditional farming techniques, hands-on mechanical methods, and biological agents. Integrated weed management (IWM) is a holistic approach that combines these techniques to reduce herbicide resistance and environmental degradation. The natural alternative method is the use of bioherbicides, derived from live microorganisms or their metabolic byproducts known to stand out as eco-friendly and targeted solutions for weed control. This review emphasizes the need for sustainable practices to balance effective weed management and the preservation of environmental and human health. This paves the path for innovative and sustainable solutions to aquatic herbicide pollution through natural product-based interventions. This study emphasizes the importance of integrated techniques for achieving sustainable agriculture while minimizing environmental and health risks.

Weed infestation is one of the most damaging biotic factors to limit crop production by competing with the crop for space, water, and nutrients. Different conventional approaches are being used to cope with weed infestation, including labor intensive manual removal and the use of soil-degrading, crop-damaging, and environment-deteriorating chemical herbicides. The use of chemicals for weed control has increased 2-fold after the green revolution and their non-judicious use is posing serious threats to mankind, animals, and biodiversity. The detrimental effects of these approaches have shifted the researchers' attention from the last two decades towards alternate, sustainable, and eco-friendly approaches to cope with weed infestation. The recent approaches of weed control, including plant and microbial allelopathy have gained popularity during last decade. Farmers still use conventional methods, but the majority of farmers are very passionate about organic agriculture and describe it as a slogan in the developed world. The effectiveness of these approaches lies in host specificity by selective bacteria and differential response towards weeds and crops. Moreover, the crop growth promoting effect of microorganisms (allelopathic bacteria) possessing various growth promoting traits, that is, mineral solubilization, phytohormone production, and beneficial enzymatic activity, provide additional benefits. The significance of this review lies in the provision of a comprehensive comparison of the conventional approaches along with their potential limitations with advanced/biological weed control approaches in sustainable production. In addition, the knowledge imparted about weed control will contribute to a better understanding of biological control methods.

The initial outbreak of Xylella fastidiosa subsp. pauca (Xfp) on olive groves in Salento (Apulia, Italy) dates back to the years 2008 and 2009 when extensive twig and branch diebacks were observed in the area of Gallipoli area (province of Lecce). Subsequently, the bacterium also spread northwards to other areas of Apulia. In many cases, entire olive groves, also including the centennial ones, died. After the crown collapse, in many cases, it has been observed that the suckers are resprouting at the base of the trunk. After two to three years, such suckers usually died as well. However, during the last four to five years, in the first Xfp outbreak area, a complete restoration of the crown of the Xfp-susceptible cultivars Ogliarola salentina and Cellina di Nard & ograve; has been noticed. Such trees or olive groves also started to yield again. To monitor this tree resilience phenomenon, together with local non-profit organizations, a survey in the province of Lecce has been carried out to find olive groves for which any curative or agronomical practices have been applied since the bacterium outbreak. Resilient olive groves are scattered in many municipalities all over the province of Lecce. The phenomenon regards both young and adult olive groves and also includes some centennial trees. In many cases, the trees are yielding fruits, and farmers started to cultivate them again. Olive resilience in Salento is already being studied and can represent a significant opportunity to restore the local and valuable olive germplasm.

Bioherbicides might be used to manage weeds as opposed to synthetic chemical herbicides, reducing environmental risks and advancing sustainable agriculture in the meantime. Bioherbicides employ different mechanisms of action to control weeds. Microbial bioherbicides may infect and damage weed plants, disrupt their growth, or produce compounds inhibiting weed development. Plant-derived bioherbicides often target specific biochemical processes crucial for weed survival. It can be applied through conventional spraying equipment, seed treatments, or soil incorporation. Bioherbicide development faces several challenges. One major hurdle is the complex diversity of weed species across different regions, requiring tailored bioherbicide solutions. The regulatory approvals for bioherbicides can be lengthy and costly, hindering widespread adoption. Scaling up production processes and ensuring product stability also pose challenges. By reducing reliance on chemical herbicides, bioherbicides can mitigate environmental pollution, protect non-target organisms, and promote sustainable agricultural practices. The development of locally adapted bioherbicides and strategic collaborations between researchers, industries, and policymakers could further enhance their prospects in a particular country. In addition, the knowledge gaps need to be addressed prior to adopting bioherbicides in agriculture. These review intended to explore the existing state of knowledge about the categories of bioherbicides, their formulation procedure, application approaches and mode of action to control weed. The bioherbicides that are currently on the market, their effects on weed physiology, and possible factors affecting their efficacy are all included in this review. Moreover, this review offers a perspective on existing challenges and future opportunities for adopting the bioherbicides in sustainable and eco-friendly agriculture.

4-Hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase inhibiting herbicides (HIHs) represent a recent class (HRAC group 27) of herbicides that offer many advantages, such as broad-spectrum activity, crop selectivity, and low resistance rates. However, emerging studies have highlighted the potential toxicity of HIHs in the environment. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the toxicity of HIHs toward nontarget organisms, including plants, microorganisms, animals, and humans. Furthermore, the present work discusses the ecological roles of these organisms in the environment and their significance in agriculture. By shedding light on the toxicity of HIHs, this study seeks to raise awareness among end users, including environmentalists, researchers, and farmers, regarding the potential ecological implications of these herbicides. Hopefully, this knowledge can contribute to informed decision-making and sustainable practices in green agriculture and environmental management.

In this study, the sustainability of the electrokinetic remediation soil flushing (EKSFs) process integrated without and with adsorption barriers (EKABs) have been evaluated for the treatment of four soils contaminated with Atrazine, Oxyfluorfen, Chlorosulfuron and 2,4-D. To this purpose, the environmental effects of both procedures (EKSFs and EKABs) have been determined through a life cycle assessment (LCA). SimaPro 9.3.0.3 was used as software tool and Ecoinvent 3.3 as data base to carry out the inventory of the equipment of each remediation setup based on experimental measurements. The environmental burden was quantified using the AWARE, USEtox, IPPC, and ReCiPe methods into 3 Endpoint impact categories (and damage to human health, ecosystem and resources) and 7 Midpoints impact categories (water footprint, global warming potential, ozone depletion, human toxicity (cancer and human non-cancer), freshwater ecotoxicity and terrestrial ecotoxicity). In general terms, the energy applied to treatment (using the Spanish energy mix) was the parameter with the greatest influence on the carbon footprint, ozone layer depletion and water footprint accounting for around 70 % of the overall impact contribution. On the other hand, from the point of view of human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity of soil treatments with 32 mg kg(-1) of the different pesticides, the EKSF treatment is recommended for soils with Chlorosulfuron. In this case, the carbon footprint and water footprint reached values around 0.36 kg of CO2 and 114 L of water per kg of dry soil, respectively. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was performed assuming different scenarios.

Context or problem: Selective herbicides control weeds in cereal crops and break down over time, allowing safe planting of legumes in the following years. However due to climatic inconsistencies and changing farming practices, this is not always the case, and residues can inhibit formation of legume/rhizobia symbioses. Objective or research question: The objectives were to determine whether: i) exposure to triasulfuron, even at extremely low levels, reduces shoot and root growth and nodulation of five diverse and widely sown legume pasture cultivars in Australian farming systems; and ii) sowing legumes prior to recommended plant-back criteria being met for chlorsulfuron, triasulfuron herbicide, clopyralid, and pyroxasulfone herbicides results in unacceptable damage to subsequently sown pasture and crop legumes, causing reduced root and shoot growth, nodulation and N fixation. Methods: A series of glasshouse and field experiments explored herbicide residue impact on commonly used legumes in dryland farming systems. Results: A glasshouse study determined triasulfuron at concentration 0.000225 g a.i/ha, a (1/100,000) dilution of the label rate caused significant (p < 0.001) decrease in nodule count, root length, root, shoot weight for Trifolium spumosum cv. Bartolo and T. subterraneum cv. Dalkeith, and at 0.225 g a.i/ha and 2.25 g a.i/ha for all five cultivars tested. A bioassay assessed T. subterraneum cv. Dalkeith health when grown in field soil-cores taken 4, 7 and 10 months after herbicide application (chlorsulfuron, triasulfuron, clopyralid and pyroxasulfone) to a wheat crop. For all three, herbicide residues significantly decreased (p < 0.001) nodule number, shoot weight, root length and whole plant weight of T. subterraneum cv. Dalkeith compared to control. A field experiment assessed nodulation of five pasture and two crop legumes sown dry (dormant summer sowing), or following rainfall 10.5 months after initial herbicide application. Nodulation of all legume cultivars decreased in plots treated with clopyralid. Chlorsulfuron decreased nodulation for all cultivars except T. glanduliferum and T. subterraneum. Triasulfuron reduced nodulation for all cultivars except Ornithopus sativus and T. spumosum. Pyroxasulfone decreased nodulation of Biserrula pelecinus cv. Casbah and Lupinus angustifolius cv. Mandalup. Conclusions: Herbicide residues from preceding cereal crops reduced fitness and symbiotically fixed N in subsequently sown pasture or crop legumes. Implications or significance: Our study highlighted label plant-back recommendations should be strictly adhered to, despite conflict with modern farming approaches of dry or early sowing) to combat climate change. This outcome may consequently lower profitability and increase the carbon footprint of farming systems.