Loose sandy soil layers are prone to liquefaction under strong earthquakes, causing damage to civil engineering structures inside or upon the liquefied ground. According to the present Japanese design guideline on liquefaction countermeasures for river levees, the entire depth of the liquefiable subsoil below river embankments should be improved. However, this approach is not economical against deep liquefiable subsoil. To rationalize the design approach, this contribution investigated the performance of a floating-type cement treatment method, in which only the shallower part of the liquefiable subsoil is reinforced. A series of centrifuge shaking table model tests was conducted under a 50g environment. The depth of improvement (cement treatment) was varied systematically, and the effect of the sloping ground was examined. The experimental results revealed that the settlements of river embankments can be reduced linearly by increasing the depth of improvement. Moreover, the acceleration of embankments can be reduced drastically by the vibration-isolation effect between the cement-treated soil and the liquefiable soil. These effects contribute to the safe retention of the embankment shape even when the liquefied sloping ground causes lateral flows. Towards practical implementation, discussions on the effect of permeability on cement-treated soil were expanded. Furthermore, the stress acting on cement-treated soil during shaking was measured using an acrylic block to explain the occurrence of cracks in the soil. (c) 2025 Japanese Geotechnical Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

The deformation characteristics of river embankments on soft ground, improved by circular deep mixed columns and a combination of circular and grid-form columns, were investigated via two centrifugal model tests. The results indicate that the slope stability of the river embankment was effectively sustained in both cases. The combined reinforcement method exhibited superior overall performance, significantly reducing settlement. The greatest settlement was observed at the top of the river embankment, and although the settlement had not fully stabilized one year after construction, the settlement rate had slowed. Compared with the circular reinforcement alone, the river embankment maximum settlement was reduced by 25.3% in the combined reinforcement. Additionally, the grid-form columns effectively reduced the horizontal displacements in the middle and lower parts of the foundation. The deep-mixed columns performed effectively in providing support and reinforcement, and none of the piles reached the bending capacity during the test process. Given the stiffness difference between the columns and the surrounding soil, the stress distribution exhibited a stress concentration effect in the model. The measured column soil stress ratio ranged between 2 and 3, which is considered reasonable. The pronounced stress concentration effect of the mixing columns contributed to a faster consolidation rate of the foundation. On the basis of the measured settlement and excess pore water pressure, the degree of consolidation of the circular column-reinforced foundation one year after construction reached over 90% and 80%, respectively. For the foundations reinforced with combined circular and grid-form deep mixed columns, the degree of consolidation reached over 80% and 75%, respectively.

The authors conducted field permeability tests on numerous river embankments using a Marriott siphon in 30-cm test holes to obtain their saturated permeability coefficients. The results revealed that the field-obtained saturated permeability coefficients were larger than those obtained as a result of the laboratory permeability test conducted on the undisturbed specimens sampled from the same location. Regarding embankments constituted by fine-grained soils, there are cases in which the field-obtained coefficients are several orders of magnitude larger than those obtained under laboratory conditions. These results suggest that the field permeability coefficient obtained by the Marriott siphon with large-diameter test holes evaluates the macroscopic permeability, including in situ heterogeneity and anisotropy. In this study, the results of the field permeability tests at two embankments of the Oda and Kano Rivers are shown. In addition, the results of the laboratory permeability test for the undisturbed specimens sampled at each field site are shown. In each survey, the field permeability coefficients were larger than both the laboratory permeability coefficients and the estimated value from particle size, as in the case of other embankments investigated so far.