Soil microarthropods affect soil ecosystems in a manner that may contribute to balancing the goals of building soil health and controlling weeds in organic agricultural systems. While soil microarthropod feeding behavior can affect plant growth, their impacts on plant communities in agricultural systems are largely unknown. A greenhouse experiment was conducted to investigate the impacts of microarthropods on weed communities. A model weed seed bank was used in each mesocosm, which included yellow foxtail (Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem&Schult.), giant foxtail (Setaria faberi Herrm.), Powell amaranth (Amaranthus powellii S. Watson), water-hemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus (Moq.) Sauer), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album L.), and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti Medik.). The study included three treatments: Collembola (Isotomiella minor, Schaffer 1896) abundance (none, low, high), soil microbial community (sterilized/non-sterilized), and fertilizer (presence/ absence of compost). A lab experiment examining individual weed species interactions with I. minor was conducted to elucidate the mechanisms driving the greenhouse experiment findings. Twenty seeds of each weed species were placed on moistened germination paper in containers with varying I. minor abundance levels (none, low, high, very high). Seed germination was recorded after five and seven days. In the greenhouse, the presence of I. minor increased total weed emergence during the first two weeks, but this effect diminished after three weeks. Increasing I. minor abundances generally decreased weed biomass, though this effect was greater in the non-sterilized soil. In the non-sterilized soil, I. minor presence decreased total aboveground weed biomass production by up to 23 %. The Amaranthus species, Powell amaranth and waterhemp, drove this effect with a 55 % and 32 % reduction in biomass, respectively. In tandem, the Amaranthus species had reduced abundances in the presence of I. minor. I. minor increased yellow foxtail germination in the lab, while not affecting the other weed species. This suggests that their effects on the Amaranthus weeds in the greenhouse were likely not caused by direct effects on germination, but instead through nutrient cycling or root herbivory. The proposed mechanism underlying these interactions is that I. minor can initially stimulate germination by feeding on seed coats, but when the seed coats are minimal can damage the seedling. Our findings indicate I. minor could impact weed growth in a manner that affects management decisions and outcomes.

BACKGROUND Weed-resistance phenomena have increased dramatically in recent years. Bioherbicides can offer a sustainable alternative to chemical weed control but they often have low water solubility and therefore low efficacy in the field. The research reported here represents the first study on the field efficacy against weeds of a nanoencapsulated bioherbicide mimic of aminophenoxazinones, namely DiS-NH2 (2,2 '-disulphanediyldianiline). Field experiments were carried out across three different locations to evaluate the bioherbicide disulphide mimic at standard (T1, 0.75 g m(-2)) and double (T2, 1.5 g m(-2)) doses when compared to no weed control (NC) and chemical weed controlled (PC) in durum wheat. RESULTS The nanoencapsulated bioherbicide displayed better soil permeability than the free compound and also showed lower ecotoxicity on comparing the toxic doses on the Caenorhabditis elegans nematode model. It was found that T2 gave the best performance in terms of phytotoxicity (-57% weed biomass when compared with NC) and crop yield enhancement (3.2 versus 2.2 Mg ha(-1) grain yield), while T1 showed comparable results to PC. T1 and T2 did not cause shifts in weed communities and this is consistent with a broad spectrum of phytotoxicity. Moreover, the nanoparticle formulation tested in this study provided stable results across all three locations. CONCLUSION It is reported here for the first time that a nanoencapsulated DiS-NH2 bioherbicide mimic provided an efficient post-emergence and contact bioherbicide that can control a wide range of weed species in durum wheat without damaging the crop. The mimic also has low ecotoxicity and improved soil permeability. (c) 2025 The Author(s). Pest Management Science published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

The competitive ability of weeds against crop plants is determined by the amount of macronutrients taken up from the soil. Macronutrient uptake is influenced by nutrient concentrations in plants and, above all, the amount of weed biomass produced per unit area. The present study was conducted as a part of a field experiment with winter oilseed rape, which has been carried out since 1967. Winter oilseed rape has been grown continuously since 1967 in the same field and in a six-field crop rotation. In winter oilseed rape monoculture, weed management was implemented to mitigate soil fatigue. Winter oilseed rape yields were twice as high in crop rotation than in monoculture, and weed biomass was more than three times higher in the continuous cropping system than in crop rotation. Winter oilseed rape yields were higher in crop rotation without a weed control than in monoculture, including monoculture with a weed control. Nitrogen (N) uptake by rape seeds and straw was significantly higher, whereas N uptake by weeds was lower in crop rotation than in monoculture. In all years of this study, N uptake by weed biomass was higher in monoculture than in crop rotation due to higher weed infestation levels in the continuous cropping system, and N uptake was not significantly affected by N content. The weed control induced a greater increase in N uptake by rape seeds and straw in monoculture than in crop rotation. The results indicate that integrating crop rotation with herbicide protection can help increase yields while reducing weeds, which promotes a more sustainable crop production system. The use of crop rotation contributes to a more efficient use of nitrogen by crops, while reducing its uptake by weeds.

Purpose: Considering that the field dodder is one of the most dangerous parasitic weeds that causes serious damage to cultivated crops, this study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of different control methods against field dodder and the damage caused by the field dodder to eggplant. As well, to determine the isothiocyanate content of turnip and broccoli plants using GC-MS analysis. Research Method: This study was conducted during 2020 and 2021. The experiment examined control methods involving turnip and broccoli as pre-cultivation plants, later both incorporated into the soil separately during specific growth stages, and then both covered and uncovered with black polyethylene mulch, and black polyethylene mulch alone. Controls included plots free of field dodder (Control 1) and plots totally infested with field dodder (Control 2). Finally, all plots were cultivated with eggplant seedlings on rows. Findings: The efficacy of control methods against field dodder in eggplant plots reached 95.81% in TM (turnip+BP mulch) , 92.30% in BM (broccoli+BP mulch), 91.25% in M (black polyethylene mulch alone), 68.26% in T (turnip alone), and 62.58% in B (broccoli alone) treatments. The highest eggplant yield of 8.396 tons/da was achieved in TM treatment. The field dodder caused a yield loss in eggplant by 82.16%, a decrease in eggplant height by 31.12%, and by 58.99% in the number of eggplant fruits in the Con 2 treatment, where the plots were fully infested with filed dodder. Originality/value: The efficiency of cruciferous plants against field dodder is attributed to their isothiocyanates content as the highest percentage of isothiocyanate compounds was found in turnip by 56.6% and the lowest in broccoli by 30.47%.

Creeping perennial weeds are difficult to manage on organic farms in semi-arid regions of the northern Great Plains. Integrated weed management practices that combine biological, cultural, and mechanical controls can improve management of these weeds, but little is known about the soil microbial response to these practices. Our work investigated the soil microbiome response to contrasting, 4-year crop sequences with standard and reduced tillage. The crop sequences included a range of crop competition phases from high (three years of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.) to low (two years of continuous fallow), within the longer 4-year period, with intermediate levels of crop competition between those two extremes. Soil samples were collected, and bacterial 16S and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing was performed. Differences in alpha diversity were not significant (p > 0.05) between tillage methods. Across all six locations, bacterial alpha diversity was negatively correlated with soil organic matter (R = -0.37, p < 0.001) while fungal alpha diversity was positively correlated (R = 0.17, p = 0.043). Bacterial community composition was not affected by crop sequence or tillage treatment. Fungal community composition was affected by crop sequence (p = 0.00163) and tillage (p = 0.02). The fungal genera Neosetophoma, Boeremia, and Paraphoma were 10 - 35-fold more abundant in continuous alfalfa compared to the mean abundance in the other crop sequences. Reduced tillage led to a 40% reduction in the fungal genus Fusarium, which contains many plant pathogen species. These results suggest that diversified crop sequences and altered tillage methods have minimal impact on bacterial communities, but fungal communities are sensitive to these management changes.

Effective weed management is crucial for maintaining soil health and ensuring the availability of essential resources, such as water, and sunlight. However, current weed control strategies fall short in terms of sustainability and environmental impact, with issues like chemical resistance, soil microplastics and non-targeted damage becoming increasingly prevalent. Here, a potential weed control fabric based on eco-friendly and abundant jute fiber is demonstrated that reduces weed growth and minimizes the level of water evaporation. Jute weed control fabrics (JWCFs) are structurally and density adjusted to create different fabric porosities. The variation in porosity effectively regulates the transmission of sunlight hindering weed photosynthesis while effectively reducing water evaporation. The optimization of microporosity improves the performance of the fabric in suppressing weeds and retaining soil moisture. Field experiments with JWCFs revealed a reduction of 61-100 % in weed growth, an average decrease of 1.6-4.3 degrees C in soil heat accumulation, 6.0-68.5 % suppression of water evaporation, and a 47.52 % weight loss after 40 days of degradation. These findings underscore the feasibility of utilizing jute fabric as an effective weed control solution, offering a sustainable alternative to traditional weed management methods.

Herbicides are widely employed in agriculture to manage weeds and enhance crop yields, but their extensive use raises significant environmental and human health concerns. Exposure to herbicides can occur through multiple pathways, including ingesting contaminated food and water, inhaling airborne particles, and dermal contact during application. This review delves into the intricate dynamics of herbicide pollution in agriculture, examining their classification, modes of exposure, and impacts on plants, animals, and humans. This study also deals with the mechanisms by which herbicides contribute to adverse health outcomes, such as cellular damage and cancer. To address these risks, this review looks at more sustainable ways to manage weeds, focusing on practical and natural alternatives to chemical herbicides. These include traditional farming techniques, hands-on mechanical methods, and biological agents. Integrated weed management (IWM) is a holistic approach that combines these techniques to reduce herbicide resistance and environmental degradation. The natural alternative method is the use of bioherbicides, derived from live microorganisms or their metabolic byproducts known to stand out as eco-friendly and targeted solutions for weed control. This review emphasizes the need for sustainable practices to balance effective weed management and the preservation of environmental and human health. This paves the path for innovative and sustainable solutions to aquatic herbicide pollution through natural product-based interventions. This study emphasizes the importance of integrated techniques for achieving sustainable agriculture while minimizing environmental and health risks.

Weed control in agricultural systems is of the utmost importance. Weeds reduce crop yields by up to 30% to 40%. Different methods are used to control weeds, such as manual, chemical, mechanical, and precision weed management. Weeds are managed more effectively by using the hand weeding method, which nevertheless falls short due to the unavailability of labor during peak periods and increasing labor wages. Generally, manual weeding tools have higher weeding efficiency (72% to 99%) but lower field capacity (0.001 to 0.033 hm(2)/h). Use of chemicals to control weeds is the most efficient and cost-effective strategy. Chemical weedicides have been used excessively and inappropriately, which has over time resulted in many issues with food and environmental damage. Mechanical weed control improves soil aeration, increases water retention capacity, slows weed growth, and has no negative effects on plants. Mechanical weed management techniques have been gaining importance recently. Automation in agriculture has significantly enhanced mechanization inputs for weed management. The development of precision weed management techniques offers an efficient way to control weeds, contributing to greater sustainability and improved agricultural productivity. Devices for agricultural automated navigation have been built on the rapid deployment of sensors, microcontrollers, and computing technologies into the field. The automated system saves time and reduces labor requirements and health risks associated with drudgery, all of which contribute to more effective farm operations. The new era of agriculture demands highly efficient and effective autonomous weed control techniques. Methods such as remote sensing, multispectral and hyperspectral imaging, and the use of robots or UAVs (drones) can significantly reduce labor requirements, enhance food production speed, maintain crop quality, address ecological imbalances, and ensure the precise application of agrochemicals. Weed monitoring is made more effective and safer for the environment through integrated weed management and UAVs. In the future, weed control by UAV or robot will be two of the key solutions because they do not pollute the environment or cause plant damage, nor do they compact the soil, because UAV sprays above the ground and robotic machines are lighter than tractor operated machines. This paper aims to review conventional, chemical, mechanical, and precision weed management methods.

Management of perennial weeds has become increasingly difficult with the reduction of herbicide use. Creeping perennials accumulate reserves in specialized belowground organs from which they regenerate new plants after a disturbance. Through tool selection, tillage operations could be optimized to reduce perennial-weed reserves and limit regeneration. In the present study, the effect of five tools on the fragmentation of the creeping roots of Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. (Canada thistle), a major perennial weed in arable crops, were analysed. A field trial was set up to measure the lengths of the root fragments left after tillage. Five tools were tested: mouldboard ploughing, rotary harrow, disc harrow, rigid-tine cultivator and goose-foot cultivator. Fragment-length distribution varied according to the tool: rotary harrow left the smallest (3.7 cm on average) and least variable fragment lengths, mouldboard ploughing the longest (12.7 cm) and most variable ones. The other tools produced intermediate-sized fragments (8-10 cm). Based on these results and literature, a model was proposed to predict perennial-weed regeneration probability from storage-organ fragments after one tillage run. The effects of six factors, which were agronomic (tillage tool), environmental (soil conditions and temperature) and biological (storage-organ fragment diameter, maximal belowground-shoot length and pre-tillage storage-organ distribution), were tested through a sensitivity analysis. According to the model, the probability of fragment regeneration success is lower for the rotary harrow than for the mouldboard plough. The most important drivers of fragment regeneration success were the biological traits: fragment diameter and maximal belowground-shoot length per unit fragment biomass. The present model should be complemented to predict the effect of tillage on perennial-weed regrowth and help improving non-chemical weed-management strategies. To achieve this, further research is needed on plant regrowth potential from storage organs and their architecture in the soil.

Interrow weed control is used in a wide range of crops, traditionally applied via physical cultivation or banded herbicide application. However, these methods may result in crop damage, development of herbicide resistance, or off-target environmental impacts. Electric interrow weed control presents an alternative, although its potential impact on crop yield requires further investigation. One of the modes of action of electric weed control is the continuous electrode-plant contact method, which passes a current through the weed and into the roots. As the current passes into the roots, it can potentially disperse through the soil to neighboring root systems. Such off-target current dispersion, particularly in moist topsoil with low resistance, poses potential concern for neighboring crops when electric interrow weed control is applied. This research evaluated the continuous electrode-plant contact method, using a Zasso (TM) XPower machine, in comparison with mowing across three trials conducted in 2022 and 2023. Both treatments were used to remove target lupine (Lupinus albus L.) plants adjacent to a row of non-target lupine. Electric weed control was applied to plants in dry soil or following a simulated rainfall event. The trials demonstrated that electric weed control and mowing did not reduce density and biomass of neighboring non-target lupine plants compared with the untreated control. Likewise, pod and seed production, grain size, and protein, as well as grain germinability and vigor of the resulting seedlings, were not reduced by these weed control tactics. This research used technology that was not fit for purpose in broadscale grain crops but concludes that electric weed control via the continuous electrode-plant contact method or mowing did not result in crop damage. Therefore, it is unlikely that damage will occur using commercial-grade electric weed control or mowing technology designed for large-acreage interrow weed control, thus offering nonchemical weed management options.